November 19, 2006

Home
Meet John
GEORGIA: Where Are We Now?
GEORGIA: John's Vision
Conclusion to Vision
Initiatives
Positions
Contact Us








Contribute          Volunteer


John Dashler's Vision for Georgia

Education     Social Problems     Georgia's Economy     Governance- How We Are Governed


FOCUS ON EDUCATION       < Previous page    Next page >

"Georgia Education Communication Network" (GECN)

Technology is the better way. I intend to establish a vast network of "studios/conference centers" around the state for fully interactive, closed circuit, video conferencing. They will be multi-purpose facilities used by Georgia's K-12 public education system, post-secondary institutions and state government agencies, too.

  • "The Island Syndrome". Following is an account of what sparked the idea. In the Governor's Community Meeting on Education I attended in January 2005 and the follow-up email report from Superintendent Cox, it is obvious that many of the problems confronting school systems throughout Georgia are not unique. All are searching for answers. I got the impression they are left to their own devises to discover solutions, despite the fact someone around the state had already solved it. Simply put, the others were just unaware. It seemed to me, they just weren't talking to each other. They weren't. One educator remarked that he felt like an "island" in the sea of educational problems. I agree. This communication system will solve any sense of isolation. Here's an illustration of the process.

    The state superintendent becomes aware of a problem experienced by many middle schools. An announcement of a planned conference is distributed to all school systems. Attendance is not mandatory. Those experiencing the same problem attend the video-conference at the nearest satellite. The state superintendent kicks off the meeting with a definition of the problem and introduces a principal, or principals that have discovered workable solutions. They present their solutions and open it up for discussion. Principals are sharing their ideas with their peers. The state superintendent serves as the moderator. A solution, or solutions are agreed upon. A report is crafted, filed by subject for future reference with new principals and disseminated throughout the state. Problem solved. No more islands. No more isolation. Peers worked together to solve their own problems. Morale improves. Costs are minimized. Win-win. The process is clean, efficient, personal and cost-efficient. Moreover, it speeds the process of improving education in Georgia.
  • Staff Development. The GECN provides a great means of conducting staff development in every education specialty, including leadership. It is also a means of conducting "certificated" formal classes that are totally interactive- extensions of classrooms, per se.
  • Reduction of the Cost of Statewide Meetings. Statewide educator conferences are expensive. Meaningfulness is questionable. I've attended many conferences, conventions, seminars, etc. I can remember few that had lasting impact. I always got "fired-up" during them and departed with good intentions. However, upon return to my "in-box", stacks of papers to review or sign, a long list of calls to make and a number of people wanting some one-on-one time, within hours the conference was forgotten and it was back to "business as usual". After many conversations with several educators, the truth revealed itself. The feelings were mutual. Everyone appreciates a few days away from the grind. But, that too is soon forgotten.

    Education is a business. It's a big business. Businesses find better ways to accomplish more with fewer resources, in less time and at less cost. It's called the entrepreneurial mindset. It is the opposite of the bureaucratic approach. I intend to infuse massive doses of the entrepreneurial mindset in Georgia's public education system.


Safe Schools Act

  • Safety and Security. In today's society, safety in schools is absolutely imperative. That was the intent of this act. Because there has not been a serious incident in Georgia's schools, it appears to have been effective. However, the measurement of its success is only the next incident away. Therefore, I will find the resources to provide $15,000 per year per school (2,150 schools) for assignment of a full-time sheriff's deputy during the school year to each and every public school in Georgia. It will cost ($32 million dollars), but this is an investment that is long overdue. Not only will our schools have an authoritative symbol of law and order with full arresting powers, it is an effort to snuff out gangs and drugs in their recruiting and embryonic stages. This initiative will not be mandated, just available. School systems and communities that want to take advantage, will do so. They will provide the additional costs. Additionally, my "Crime Busters" initiative will complement this effort in communities throughout Georgia.
  • Discipline in Schools. Although well-intentioned, the Safe Schools Act has created a "management/leadership" problem that must be solved. Schools seem to be down-playing, if not disregarding, many discipline reports from teachers. Why? Accountability provisions. (Too many incidents and the school is declared "unsafe". Parents have the option to send their children to another school.) This must stop. When we say we "support" classroom teachers, our actions should reflect the claim. Concealing their problems is one of those specific issues that evidences lack of support, even disrespect. Again, this is a leadership issue. Nonetheless, it is a real problem. It cannot simply be taken lightly. A mechanism is needed. I think establishing a "hot line" in the State Superintendent's office may be a practical solution. Any teacher that reports an incident to their principal that is given the "soft touch" to avoid reporting, can report the incident to the "hot line" anonymously. Once confirmed, a letter will be written to the system superintendent and board of education. Too many "hot line" reports on a specific school or within the same system will result in a formal investigation.


ESOL

Let me be clear about this one point. I believe that English is the only language that should be taught in Georgia's schools, except for foreign language requirements in the College Preparatory Program in our high schools. However, that does not mitigate the need to teach English to new students that do not possess grade level command of the English language. Nor, does it mitigate the need for English to be taught to non-English speaking parents. Nor, does it mitigate the need to educate non-English speaking illiterate parents. All are component parts of my "Community School" concept. But, in the communities where the problem is less pronounced, meeting the needs of the students will be the focus of our effort. One such program is "Project Georgia" in Dalton City Schools founded by former US Congressman Erwin Mitchell. It is a model program worth investigating for statewide implementation. There may be other programs. They will be scrutinized, too. The best and most cost-efficient model will become part of our new models for schools.



School Year/Allocation of Time

Okay, we tried it. Semesters in Georgia's K-12 schools begin in early August to enable finals to be taken before the Christmas break. What other benefit is there? Let's face it. The changes have created havoc with working parents and with the economy. Is the "gain" worth the "pain", or the additional costs. It's time to seriously consider returning to the old cycle- Labor Day to post-Memorial Day. And, part of the conversation needs to address every issue regarding length of day, number of days in the year, hours in school day, remediating, etc.



The HOPE Scholarship

This is a real big deal to me. When Governor Miller conceived of the vision and made it happen, I thought it was one of the most insightful initiatives to have ever evolved from government. I still do. Unfortunately, I don't think the vision he had is what HOPE has evolved into. Too much money is wasted on remedial classes because too many high school graduates are not prepared for the rigors of college level studies. As a result, too many kids quit and drop-out of college, which is a 100% waste of HOPE dollars. The pre-k program has benefits, but it has not impacted the drop-out problem as he must have envisioned. Pre-k consumes nearly half of the Lotto proceeds that go to education. Change is needed. Here are my ideas.

  • Repeal '04 and '05 Reductions. The limits placed on "hours" paid by HOPE in the '05 legislative session, and provisions for cutting back book and "fee" allowances in the '04 legislative session, should be repealed.
  • The HOPE Scholarship Should be Expanded.
    • Under-graduate studies. Recipients of the HOPE should be able to achieve their post-secondary degrees and certificates without financial concerns. If funds gained by changes in remedial classes and pre-k are as significant as I anticipate, the HOPE should be able to expand in scope of "covered" costs. Perhaps a means test should be established for expanded coverage. The point is, no hard-working young person that has made the commitment, has the ability and met the criteria for the HOPE should be deprived of the opportunity to complete their college degree because of insufficient funds.
    • Post-graduate degree programs: "HOPE-PLUS". One of the age-old problems facing Georgia has been the shortage of qualified medical practitioners and teachers in our rural and remote areas. Similarly, one of the age-old problems for hard working students with demonstrated ability and performance is financing post-graduate studies. There is a fit. I will establish a list of post-graduate programs that will be fully funded with HOPE dollars through completion. Participating students will receive their education in exchange for a commitment to work for the state in locations of most need. Students will commit one year of work in exchange for each year of post-graduate work funded. Anyone that does not complete their degreed program must reimburse the state all money that was spent on their behalf in the post-graduate program.
  • Remedial Classes. HOPE dollars should not be spent remediating high school graduates that are not properly prepared for college level study. If the problem is "them", they shouldn't be there in the first place. If the problem is with the high school that inflated the student's grades and thus conferred a fraudulent diploma, the high school must be made accountable. In the short-term, accountability will be that of the parents. Presently, parents aren't too upset when this scenario unfolds, because it doesn't cost bucks out of their own pockets. When they have to pay for remedial classes despite Johnny having met the "B", or 3.2 GPA criteria, but must take remedial classes before being permitted to take credited courses, mom and dad are going to be upset. And, they should be. To them I say this, our solution is going to take some time. You are the short-term solution. Go to your local board, the superintendent and the principal of your high school and raise the roof. When parents do, grade inflation will disappear. Academic expectations will improve. Your younger children and children of your neighbors will receive a better QBE (Quality Basic Education)!
  • High School Diplomas and Endorsements. There is another problem. Presently, there are three acknowledgments awarded upon completion of high school. Students who complete curriculum requirements, but fail the high school graduation test are awarded a certificate of completion. Students who have a passing GPA and pass the graduation tests are awarded a diploma. There are two diplomas: the college preparatory and the "regular" diploma with an endorsement for any vocational program completed. I will promote the following changes as part of the new model:
    • Students that complete the college preparatory program should be required to take the SAT or ACT. (Paid by HOPE funds for those that pass a "means" test.)
    • Students that do not take the college preparatory program should not be required, and even discouraged, if not prohibited from taking the SAT or ACT.
    • Only those students that complete the college preparatory program and meet the criteria for the HOPE will be eligible for the HOPE in a 4-year degreed program.
    • For students who pursue the "regular" course of study for a vocational endorsement, the HOPE will have limitations. They may attend a 2-year certificated program in one of our regional colleges or attend a vocational program in one of the institutions of DTAE. Of course, any student that successfully completes a certificated course of general studies in one of our 2-year programs and maintains good standing for the HOPE, will be able to continue their education on the HOPE in one of our 4-year programs and so on.
    • The benefits are many. Waste of HOPE funds will be minimized. College level drop-outs will decline. Deserving students have greater opportunity. SATs and ACTs will improve. Students will be better prepared to succeed. Students will be properly channeled into programs more appropriately suited to their preparation. There will be more visibility and incentive to properly "channel" students in the middle schools.
< Previous page    Next page >


Contribute          Volunteer



  •  home  •   meet john dashler   •   georgia: where are we   •   john dashler's vision for georgia   •  contact us   •  

  •  news flash  •  contribute   •  volunteer   •  


Website by eCampaignHQ